| |||||||||
|
HHS Issues Final Rule Addressing Physician Self-Referrals HHS
Secretary Donna E. Shalala today announced final regulations addressing
self-referrals by physicians. The
final regulations will protect beneficiaries and taxpayers from potentially
abusive referral patterns, while making it easier for physicians and providers
to comply with the law. The
self-referral law prohibits physicians from referring Medicare patients for
certain health care services to entities with which the physicians or their
immediate family members have a financial relationship.
A financial relationship can be either an ownership interest or a
compensation arrangement, and can be direct or indirect.
The law also contains a number of exceptions. "We've
taken a common-sense approach to the law to prevent potentially abusive
referrals while recognizing many legitimate business practices and financial
arrangements," Secretary Shalala said. "Physicians should be able to
structure their business arrangements to comply with the law, while continuing
to provide high quality health care to beneficiaries." Studies
by the HHS Office of Inspector General and other governmental agencies have
shown that referrals to entities with which physicians have a financial
relationship encourage excessive use of those services.
In certain cases, the practices are also considered unethical by the
American Medical Association. "We
believe this statute is a powerful deterrent to fraud and abuse," said HHS
Inspector General June Gibbs Brown. "The
regulation will be another strong step in the department's efforts to reduce
waste, fraud and abuse in the Medicare program."
The physician referral law provides a variety of sanctions including
denial or refund of payment and civil monetary penalties. Consistent
with the proposed rule, the final rule prohibits physicians from making
referrals for the targeted services to most entities which the physicians own in
whole or in part. In contrast, the
final rule generally permits physicians to refer to entities with which they
have a compensation relationship, as long as the compensation paid to the
physician is no more than would be paid to someone who provided the same
services but was not in a position to generate business for the entity. The
final rule also clarifies some of the exceptions to the self-referral
prohibition and offers clear guidance regarding how to structure financial
arrangements to comply with the exceptions.
To give physicians time to adjust existing business arrangements that
would not previously have triggered the referral prohibition, the rule will be
effective on Jan. 4, 2001-one year after its publication in the Federal
Register. "The
final rule should allow physicians and health care businesses to stay
competitive in a rapidly changing industry while protecting beneficiaries and
taxpayers," said Robert Berenson, acting deputy administrator of the Health
Care Financing Administration (HCFA), the agency that runs Medicare. "We
know that most doctors refer with the best interests of their patients in mind.
I believe that the statute and this final regulation allow doctors to
continue to meet the needs of their patients." The
final rule also substantially reduces the potential financial liability of
hospitals and other entities that provide any of the targeted services and
submit claims for prohibited referrals, if they neither knew nor had reason to
suspect that they had an indirect financial relationship with a referring
physician. Under the proposed rule,
any claim submitted by an entity for services rendered pursuant to a prohibited
referral would have been denied, even if the entity had no reason to suspect
that it had an indirect financial relationship with the referring physician. In
defining what practices the law exempts from the self-referral prohibition, the
final rule expands the law's exceptions for services provided in a physician's
office and for services provided by managed-care plans.
In addition, it allows exceptions to permit certain indirect compensation
arrangements, to allow small, non-monetary gifts, and to protect financial
arrangements between academic medical centers and their faculties if certain
criteria are met. The
self-referral law, as enacted in 1989, prohibited a physician from referring a
patient to a clinical laboratory with which he or she (or an immediate family
member) has a financial relationship. Effective
Jan. 1, 1995, Congress extended the law to prohibit a physician from referring
patients to providers of 10 other categories of health care services if the
physician (or an immediate family member) has a financial relationship with the
service provider. The 10 affected
services are: physical therapy services; occupational therapy services;
radiology services and supplies; radiation therapy services and supplies;
durable medical equipment and supplies; parenteral and enteral nutrients,
equipment, and supplies; prosthetics, orthotics, and prosthetic devices and
supplies; home health services; outpatient prescription drugs; and inpatient and
outpatient hospital services. The
law also prohibits an entity from billing for services provided as the result of
a prohibited referral. The
provisions in the physician self-referral rule complement other laws designed to
combat waste, fraud, and abuse, including the anti-kickback law. Potentially
abusive financial relationships that may be permitted under the physician
self-referral law could be addressed through other laws. HCFA
published a final rule covering physician self-referrals for clinical laboratory
services on Aug. 14, 1995. The
agency then published a proposed rule to implement the expanded law in 1998 and
received almost 13,000 comments from the public.
The new final rule modifies the proposed rule, addressing the most
contentious issues raised in the proposal. HCFA
intends to address in another final rule comments received on provisions of the
proposed rule that are not addressed in today's final rule. The second final
rule also will address public comments on this week's final rule. HCFA intends
to move as quickly as possible on the second rule. |