| |||||||||
|
States
Can Offer Expanded Health Coverage Under New HHS Medicaid Rule The
Department of Health and Human Services today published new rules in the Federal
Register to help enable more low-income Americans with high medical expenses
gain health care coverage under the Medicaid program. The
change, which will allow states greater flexibility in determining Medicaid
eligibility, could potentially benefit tens of thousands of Americans.
It enables states to offer health coverage to low-income youth who are
still in school or are making the transition to jobs, as well as to more parents
leaving welfare for work. It may also help the elderly, people with disabilities
and families with disabled children to obtain health coverage at home, instead
of having to live in nursing care facilities. The
change addresses problems created by existing rules that limit Medicaid
eligibility for certain individuals to extremely low income levels that were
related to the levels used in the old Aid to Families with Dependent Children
(AFDC) program, prior to welfare reform.
The rule is aimed at assisting those individuals whose income is slightly
above traditional Medicaid income limits, but who are strapped with significant
medical bills. Prior
to this new regulation, under "medically needy" rules, a state could
offer Medicaid coverage to such persons once they have spent so much of their
income on medical bills that what is left over meets the states' medically needy
income standard. In more than 40
percent of the states, however, that standard is significantly below the poverty
level and Americans with high medical bills were often forced to keep their
incomes low to qualify. Under the new rule, a state could disregard increased
portions of a person's income, such as the income necessary to pay for food,
clothing or housing before determining whether the individual is eligible for
Medicaid. The
new rule is of special significance for the elderly and people with
disabilities. Under the old rules,
people in institutions could qualify for Medicaid coverage at much higher income
levels than if they lived in the community. This "institutional bias" acts as a barrier to
living in the community for many persons with disabilities. The change will allow states the flexibility to change their
own rules so that elderly or people with a disability would not have to lose
their health coverage if they move into a community setting. "This
new policy has important potential to open doors to community living for
thousands of Americans who are able to live at home and do not want to be
confined in nursing homes," said HHS Secretary Donna E. Shalala. "It
can enable people to obtain the services they need to live in their own home
despite a chronic illness or disability, and can also help single parents making
the transition from welfare to work." The
policy change can also be used by states to help low-income people who have a
disability to participate in the workforce, by allowing states to disregard
certain earnings or other sources of income and still retain vital health
coverage under Medicaid. For
example, a state might disregard income from a savings account used by a worker
to save funds for the purchase of a home, automobile, or similar items that
promote independence. "This
change could permit elderly people and people with disabilities to retain enough
income to meet life's basic living expenses and still get help with their
catastrophic medical bills," said Tim Westmoreland, director of the Center
for Medicaid and State Operations in HHS' Health Care Financing Administration (HCFA),
which administers the Medicaid program. "All
comments we received on the notice of proposed rule-making were very
favorable," said Westmoreland. "Such
overwhelming support is just one indication of how important this change is to
the states that already provide critical health coverage under Medicaid to
millions of Americans."
New federal spending under the proposed regulation is estimated at $960
million over five years. States
would also spend a similar additional amount over that period. |